From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17837: 24.4.50; Search very slow Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:59:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83lhsjpvi4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837g47shrk.fsf@gnu.org> <834mzbrplv.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbrqqowi.fsf@gnu.org> <83fvitqfso.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403794838 28097 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2014 15:00:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17837@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 26 17:00:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BA6-0000eH-0I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:00:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BA5-0003x4-97 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0B9p-0003hX-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0B9h-0005A0-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:00:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0B9h-00058b-8p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0B9g-0005bB-GK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:00:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:00:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17837.140379478821462 (code B ref 17837); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:00:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2014 14:59:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33825 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0B9L-0005Zs-2U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:59:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:40168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0B9F-0005ZS-6q for 17837@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N7S006006PMXH00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 17837@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:58:20 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N7S002K26X8LG50@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:58:20 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90840 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:10:03 -0400 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: 17837@debbugs.gnu.org > > The problem is not simple font-lock. It is due to searching for > other matches for the search string. If this were true, then setting isearch-lazy-highlight to nil ought to make Isearch significantly faster for you. I tried that and didn't see any noticeable difference; do you?