From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18238: Fix for DOS build when using more accurate config[.h].in Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:05:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83lhqwjk4i.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407693988 943 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2014 18:06:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18238@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 10 20:06:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXVb-0001Lj-CF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 20:06:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60540 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXVa-0001sJ-7b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXVR-0001rK-46 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXVL-00069H-0x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:06:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXVK-00069D-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXVK-0001Cq-9v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18238.14076939354600 (code B ref 18238); Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2014 18:05:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXUs-0001C7-Or for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:57082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGXUp-0001Bo-0d for 18238@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NA300200R1DY200@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 18238@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:05:24 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NA3002LDRL0VD80@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:05:24 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92385 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 17:47:11 +0100 > From: Reuben Thomas > > DJGPP does actually have getrlimit. The special config[.h].in for MSDOS > lies and says it hasn't. However, this is a white lie, because getrlimit on > DJGPP doesn't support RLIMIT_AS/RLIMIT_DATA, which is what we want, so we > still want the workaround code. The following patch simply reverses the > order of a couple of tests in vm-limit.c so that being on MSDOS overrides > HAVE_GETRLIMIT. > > Is it OK to install? I don't see why the suggested code is better than the existing one. HAVE_GETRLIMIT means more than its name says, as you point out, so DJGPP is correct in not defining one.