From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:51:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83lh9fky73.fsf@gnu.org> References: <10400.1448915503@allegro.localdomain> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448916808 21857 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2015 20:53:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22043@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mike Kupfer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 21:53:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VRf-0004eT-Ac for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:53:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VRe-0007wY-Jc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VRb-0007wT-3i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:53:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VRW-0007Us-CF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:53:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VRW-0007Ud-8w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VRV-0004hc-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22043 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22043-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22043.144891675118039 (code B ref 22043); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22043) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2015 20:52:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VR1-0004gt-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:37208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3VQh-0004gR-36 for 22043@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:52:30 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYN00D00AURM300@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 22043@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:51:29 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYN0061CB9T6670@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:51:29 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <10400.1448915503@allegro.localdomain> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109477 Archived-At: > From: Mike Kupfer > cc: Drew Adams , 22043@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:31:43 -0800 > > Search commands in Emacs generally perform character folding by > default > > (or maybe "commonly" instead of "generally"). I'm okay with that, if it makes the difference.