From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29039: `iter-do' doesn't instrument its body Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 14:32:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83lgjv5wze.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509190395 28145 195.159.176.226 (28 Oct 2017 11:33:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 11:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 29039@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 28 13:33:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PMR-0006S2-TC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:33:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60521 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PMX-0005jx-PT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PMQ-0005jK-9Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PMN-0007VI-6k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PMN-0007VC-3a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PMM-0007dZ-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 11:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29039.150919035529315 (code B ref 29039); Sat, 28 Oct 2017 11:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2017 11:32:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PLv-0007cl-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:32:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PLu-0007cZ-Eh for 29039@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PLm-00075E-7G for 29039@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PLm-00075A-48; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:32:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4587 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e8PLl-0001Xg-Hh; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:32:25 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Pogonyshev on Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:07:00 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139101 Archived-At: > From: Paul Pogonyshev > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:07:00 +0200 > > Attached trivial patch simply adds `(declare (debug ...))' to the > macro. I believe it is perfectly safe and trivial, no mention in NEWS > etc. is needed. I would ask to merge it to branch 26 if possible. Why do you want it on the emacs-26 branch? Thanks.