From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 17:41:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83lg1sc8ob.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5C7FD591.9090505@gmx.at> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="144429"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34765@debbugs.gnu.org, alexanderm@web.de To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 06 16:42:49 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Ygv-000bOF-FM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 16:42:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35149 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Ygu-0001ng-G5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:42:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YgG-0001U8-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YgG-0000KN-AP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YgG-0000K4-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YgE-0001od-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:42:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34765 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34765-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34765.15518868786927 (code B ref 34765); Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34765) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2019 15:41:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YfW-0001nf-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46127) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YfT-0001nR-BF for 34765@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YfL-0007xB-T4; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2274 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h1YfL-0005sM-H3; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:41:07 -0500 In-reply-to: <5C7FD591.9090505@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:13:37 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156098 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:13:37 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: 34765@debbugs.gnu.org > > Maybe we should indeed rebind 'buffer-list-update-hook' around the > 'generate-new-buffer' and 'kill-buffer' calls of 'with-temp-buffer'. Wouldn't that be a backward-incompatible change? How long did we call that hook for temporary buffers? Also, can generate-new-buffer and/or kill-buffer run some hooks which might modify other, non-temporary buffers?