From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41087: 27.0.91; How to remove Emacs 27 changes to minibuffer? Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 05:22:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfm7m871.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="24082"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41087@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 04:24:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnFs-00065a-H5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 04:24:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58600 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnFr-0008BJ-J3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnFa-00080w-U7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnFa-0000Vn-JA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnFa-00032y-ET for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 02:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41087 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41087-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41087.158864540911666 (code B ref 41087); Tue, 05 May 2020 02:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41087) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2020 02:23:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34375 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnF2-000325-V4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnF0-00031q-SO for 41087@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnEo-0007U6-IV; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4702 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jVnEn-0001Kb-OF; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:23:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Mon, 4 May 2020 14:07:59 -0700 (PDT)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179710 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 14:07:59 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > > Emacs 27 is unfortunately _totally_ unusable for me. Cannot do the > slightest thing. Please provide at least some examples of the difficulties. It's hard to say anything intelligent without that much. > I think that some of the problems come from the changes to minibuffer > and echo-area behavior. Regardless of whether that is the case, I want > to undo those changes. Is there an option for that? (I hope so.) If > not, what changes do I need to make from Lisp, to get back the prior > behavior? The NEWS mentions a few variables that should allow you to do that, but without knowing what you want to undo, it is hard to say more.