From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42154: 26.3; [DOC] This wording is too complex: frame's window-system window. Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 10:21:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfjzvj7g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878sg3w6il.fsf@laposte.net> <83blkyxe5m.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23942"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42154-done@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: ke.vigouroux@laposte.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 04 09:22:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcV0-000686-9W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 09:22:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43264 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUy-0004Dm-Td for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUs-0004D4-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUs-0003rf-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUs-0000Ie-7L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:22:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 07:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 42154 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 42154@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, ke.vigouroux@laposte.net Original-Received: via spool by 42154-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D42154.15938473141133 (code D ref 42154); Sat, 04 Jul 2020 07:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42154-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2020 07:21:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUj-0000IC-Um for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:21:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUg-0000Hx-HO for 42154-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:21:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUb-0003qp-11; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:21:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4149 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jrcUT-0005ky-VW; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:21:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83blkyxe5m.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 02 Jul 2020 16:03:17 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182678 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 16:03:17 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: ke.vigouroux@laposte.net, 42154@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Richard Stallman > > Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 23:47:13 -0400 > > Cc: 42154@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > One thing I notice is that this uses passive voice. > > That tends to be harder to read; also, it leaves the > > subject unstated, and that vagueness can hurt. > > Is the below better? > > If this is 'above', the window-system displays the window that > corresponds to the frame above all other window-system's windows > that do not have the 'above' property set. I installed that rewording, and I'm marking this bug done.