From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42366: UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:44:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfir99d0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn8wx3k2.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <875z9xcrrk.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6z99nv3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo2djhp2.fsf@gnus.org> <834kph9mja.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu39jg7r.fsf@gnus.org> <83zh79879h.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mt85mp.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo2d85gs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 06 15:46:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gDt-0000bN-I9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:46:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gDs-0003AW-Jz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:46:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gDb-0002wv-9k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gDb-0003uN-0Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gDa-0007Cw-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42366 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 42366-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42366.159672151627639 (code B ref 42366); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42366) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 13:45:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gCp-0007Bj-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gCn-0007BV-KM for 42366@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gCi-0003cV-68; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2270 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gCf-0005sv-G7; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:45:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:57:04 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184180 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:57:04 +0200 > > Eli> To clarify: the original complaint, AFAIU, was about the display in a > Eli> GUI frame, in which case the layout is entirely ours. You are now > Eli> saying that the problem is on TTY frames, but there we don't control > Eli> the layout at all. > > I donʼt think I said that. The TTY frame layout looks ok, the gui > frame one has what looks like extra pixels between the characters. Then I don't think I understand what you are saying when I look at the screenshots you posted. When you say "between the characters", do you mean between two successive lines (i.e., vertically), or do you mean between two adjacent characters on the same line?