From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40317: 27.0.90; Reverting a buffer that visits C file signals an error Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:09:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfh97o86.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k1335m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6lgb8o.fsf@cassou.me> <83tuvx7q74.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org To: Damien Cassou Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 16 17:10:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ4a-0005z6-Rz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:10:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ4Z-0004Vy-R8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ4M-0004UU-3h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ4L-0003mM-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ4L-0001Sv-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40317 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40317-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40317.16002689535565 (code B ref 40317); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 15:09:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3Z-0001Rh-7f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3X-0001RQ-7A for 40317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3R-0003is-5b; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4127 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ3Q-0000uv-6k; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mu1pg4g1.fsf@cassou.me> (message from Damien Cassou on Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:42 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188171 Archived-At: > From: Damien Cassou > Cc: 40317@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:51:42 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Does that happen with _any_ C# file? If not, can you post an example > > of a file where this happens, and a recipe to reproduce the problem? > > I don't know how to reproduce, it is infrequent and seems random. Ah, so it isn't consistent. And the Lisp backtrace is the same as the one shown in the original report?