From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41852: 27.0.50; text-scale commands don't scale header of tabulated-list-mode Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:15:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfg1nfv1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <955fe4fe-a64d-b7c6-fe31-7efd810f97a5@ims.co.at> <83mu553e0x.fsf@gnu.org> <953c6df9-59b4-8b57-0be3-600d147fe9c7@ims.co.at> <83y2k2pabb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnzmnioj.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13141"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: thomas.hisch@ims.co.at, 41852@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 16:16:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsQw-0003KU-M6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:16:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55570 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsQv-0004HZ-Nn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsQk-0004Fu-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsQk-00071v-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsQk-0000kG-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41852 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41852.16032033232803 (code B ref 41852); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2020 14:15:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46214 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsQ6-0000j8-Kw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:15:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsQ4-0000is-9n for 41852@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:15:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsPx-0006kI-Ph; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:15:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4073 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsPq-0003Kb-6k; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:15:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:41:48 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191092 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:41:48 -0700 > Cc: thomas.hisch@ims.co.at, 41852@debbugs.gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Can we continue supporting text-scale-mode-remapping in > > text-scale-mode--remappings? I'd like to avoid backward-incompatible > > changes if possible. > > Do you mean something like this? Yes. Except that now I'm asking whether we need to obsolete the variable. is that just because of the name?