From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44598: [PATCH] Do not show obsolete options in customize Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:43:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83lff5ya5u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lfh743j8.fsf@gnu.org> <871rgyp9g4.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 44598@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 13 08:44:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTkg-0002CD-5N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:44:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTkf-0004J5-6w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTkY-0004In-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTkX-000727-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTkX-0004gV-So for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:44:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44598 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 44598-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44598.160525341417964 (code B ref 44598); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44598) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2020 07:43:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTk6-0004fg-Hi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56224) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTk4-0004fU-J4 for 44598@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:43:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTjy-0006qi-OK; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:43:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3268 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kdTjw-0006F2-V6; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:43:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871rgyp9g4.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193209 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:11:07 +0000 > Cc: 44598@debbugs.gnu.org > > Stefan Kangas writes: > > > From 66221f1d0f7ee4f2af0d6c65fe956cce711b48e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Stefan Kangas > > Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:44:20 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] Do not show obsolete options in customize > > > > * lisp/cus-edit.el (custom-variable-obsolete): Delete face. > > Perhaps it should be marked obsolete first? You mean, literally an obsolete face? Or did you mean a new variable that would allow displaying the obsolete option as we do today? For the latter, it might make sense, as a "fire escape" for people who want the old behavior. For the former, perhaps we shouldn't remove the face at all, see my other mail.