From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44839: 27.1; rmail: output to file does not go to next message Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 19:07:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83lfelmmuk.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7931"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44839-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 18:08:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hi-0001za-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:08:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hh-0005gT-2y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3ha-0005eo-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hZ-0008K5-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hZ-0004Qw-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:08:01 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 44839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 44839@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, pot@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 44839-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D44839.160658327317025 (code D ref 44839); Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44839-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2020 17:07:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hR-0004QX-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:07:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hO-0004QK-Mo for 44839-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hJ-00089W-I4; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:07:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4248 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kj3hI-0000dZ-8N; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 12:07:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= on Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:35:41 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194490 Archived-At: > From: Francesco Potortì > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:35:41 +0100 > > rmail-output should do its work, then mark the message as deleted, then > go to the next message. The last step is not done: the filed and > deleted message is still displayed. This is a regression. > > I suppose it should be quite easy to pinpoint, but I don't have time > right now, so I am filing a bug. Here is the value of the relevant vars > for me: > > (setq rmail-output-reset-deleted-flag t > rmail-delete-after-output t > rmail-confirm-expunge nil) This is indeed a regression introduced by the handling of the new option rmail-output-reset-deleted-flag, which you have customized. Should be fixed now.