From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43268: Update Org for Emacs 27.2 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:27:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83lfe0csqz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgbskgcf.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfhkmjyp.fsf@gnu.org> <875z8ogwbk.fsf@gmx.de> <87h7opie5k.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4921"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 43268@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 14 16:29:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kopmn-00016N-8K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:29:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35366 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kopmm-0006oT-9n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kopmY-0006nd-1C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kopmX-0005tO-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:29:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kopmX-0002x3-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:29:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43268 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43268-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43268.160795968711282 (code B ref 43268); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43268) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2020 15:28:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53816 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kople-0002vt-Oh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kopld-0002v1-Cb for 43268@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:28:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koplY-0005og-6K; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1452 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1koplV-0006q5-1Q; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:27:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h7opie5k.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec on Sun, 13 Dec 2020 22:34:15 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196051 Archived-At: > From: Kévin Le Gouguec > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 43268@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 22:34:15 +0100 > > Closing this bug seems to have removed it from the list shown at the top > of https://debbugs.gnu.org/43018 ("Fixed blocked by"); however, it's > still present on M-x debbugs-gnu-emacs-release-blocking-reports (like > 42851). > > 1. Do we care? Only if you look at the results of that command (I don't). > 2. If so, > a. should I tell debbugs to "unblock 43018 by 43268"? That'd be incorrect, because the bug could be reopened. > b. should we teach debbugs.el to ignore closed bugs when listing > blockers? Why bother?