From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:56:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83lfbqbq3g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35564"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 14 16:57:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJlm-00094E-Jn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 16:57:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38200 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJll-0006fx-M5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:57:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJle-0006ec-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJle-0003CE-CZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJle-0005iO-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161331818621923 (code B ref 46495); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2021 15:56:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36587 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJl3-0005hX-ON for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:56:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52992) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJl1-0005hI-G2 for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:56:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJkv-0002zZ-Ny; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:56:17 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1348 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lBJku-00088p-Rw; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 10:56:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Andy Moreton on Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:24:32 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200013 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:24:32 +0000 > > > I suspect that this problem may not be Windows-specific, and should be > > reproducable on Linux, but I have not tried that. > > I have also tried the mingw.org 32bit toolchain (i686-pc-mingw32) when > configured with with "--with-nativecomp --with-wide-int", and that > works. Thanks, that's good news. > Thus this bug seems to be a problem with the MSYS2 mingw32 32bit > toolchain (i686-w64-mingw32) only. It does seem that way, although I wonder what could that problem be...