From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:55:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfa6kl8s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfbqbq3g.fsf@gnu.org> <868s7pwvq8.fsf@gmail.com> <28FB9567-61E6-4083-8711-6CF6C8A493F4@gnu.org> <86o8gjheaw.fsf@gmail.com> <865z2p0zrq.fsf@gmail.com> <86pn0w59nj.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2eap33a.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4449"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: akrl@sdf.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 29 17:56:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuFR-00010l-Dn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:56:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuFQ-0004Yk-EC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuFI-0004Vy-HF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuFI-0005Ac-9O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuFI-0002cP-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:56:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:56:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161703334610020 (code B ref 46495); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:56:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 15:55:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuEz-0002bR-K1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuEw-0002aX-SI for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46741) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuEq-0004us-Nk; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:55:36 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4966 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lQuEb-0007MV-Ea; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:55:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83y2eap33a.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:27:21 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203252 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:27:21 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org > > One issue left, which I'm pursuing locally, is the one with strange > gaps in the C backtraces. You can see the traces of that on the > gdb-patches mailing list. The GDB experts seem to indicate that the prologue of functions we produce is different from the prologue normally produced by GCC from C code on x86. See https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-March/177334.html Is that possible? are we doing something that could affect the prologue of the natively-compiled Lisp code?