From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47860: 28.0.50; Mini buffer resize when lines are truncated regression Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:43:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83lf9es5ax.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835z0kulkq.fsf@gnu.org> <83blabtqqz.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnsys9ml.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20410"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47860@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org To: Aaron Jensen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 19 16:45:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV9X-0005CY-Pw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:45:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39608 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV9W-0006q0-NQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV94-0006p8-4U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV93-0000xn-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV93-0008Oc-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47860.161884345632207 (code B ref 47860); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2021 14:44:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV8J-0008NO-P2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:44:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV8I-0008NC-E8 for 47860@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:44:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV8D-0000NB-0A; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4101 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lYV8C-0005ek-FQ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:44:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Aaron Jensen on Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:24:19 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204464 Archived-At: > From: Aaron Jensen > Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:24:19 -0500 > Cc: Gregory Heytings , 47860@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:02 AM Aaron Jensen wrote: > > I have not tested with Emacs 27. I have, however, tested with Emacs 28 > > with and without the commit I mentioned. > > > > I forgot to mention that when I reverted the commit I got a conflict > so I effectively undid another commit in the same area, so my diff > looked like this: > > if ((op & MOVE_TO_POS) != 0 > - && (IT_CHARPOS (*it) > to_charpos > - || (IT_CHARPOS (*it) == to_charpos > - && to_charpos == ZV > - && (ZV_BYTE <= 1 || FETCH_BYTE (ZV_BYTE - 1) != '\n')))) > + && IT_CHARPOS (*it) > to_charpos) > { This basically goes back to what we had in all versions up to and including 27.