From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50999: 29.0.50; Deleting libraries obsolete since Emacs 24 Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 15:27:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83lf374px5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r1d1nn5m.fsf@gnus.org> <875yuc7y44.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23848"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50999@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 05 14:34:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjel-0005ys-Q7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:34:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjek-0002xG-LL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:34:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjZ9-0006qH-6S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjZ8-0006r4-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjZ8-0006ja-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50999 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50999-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50999.163343688825803 (code B ref 50999); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 12:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50999) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2021 12:28:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjYG-0006i7-5d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42128) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjYC-0006hT-2A for 50999@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjY6-0006kr-Fg; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4851 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjY6-0007fg-2e; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:27:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875yuc7y44.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 05 Oct 2021 09:02:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216439 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 09:02:35 +0200 > Cc: 50999@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I think we should just decide what we want to do in Emacs 29, and then > > apply the same principle for deleting obsolete functions, variables, > > etc. > > Yup. I think everything obsoleted before Emacs 24.3 should be up for > removal in Emacs 29 (since that'd be about a decade old when Emacs 29 is > released), but perhaps Eli has a different opinion. Eli? I'd prefer to see the full list of the candidates before we decide. It could be that some items on the list need to get special treatment for some valid reasons, or perhaps because we've learned something new since they were obsoleted. Thanks.