From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52345: Add the new packages section to the Italian tutorial Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 20:44:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83lf0wxnk8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7bk99zu.fsf@metapensiero.it> <838rwwzes4.fsf@gnu.org> <8735n48e6a.fsf@metapensiero.it> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5324"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 52345@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lele Gaifax Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 07 19:50:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mufXX-0001Aj-3Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 19:50:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46364 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mufXV-0002Jf-WE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mufSY-0007p7-L3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mufSY-0001YJ-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mufSX-0007sE-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52345 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 52345-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52345.163890267430212 (code B ref 52345); Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52345) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2021 18:44:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38624 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mufS6-0007rE-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:44:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mufS4-0007qt-Ec for 52345@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=53252 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mufRi-0001KV-VW; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:44:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=tid9zwQrwkDKr9uYN/kD6xxlkfmq4hpuvKPKvgxO1/c=; b=nsTGZwZBR6qO 3hc2gx1bqrYBYplEmGPlZ/quHXDcwjmz0dU3UtscA+pxs0lpmV8fePXHg3PWSeMJ54RYPCKZxmOSH Tdnualv+t5a+KJyxHXjFh+PeBOOaAtCV8qck4zGVSzI/72tVHqglk4dNaow/t1FBZ/dNMBBzG22bK XTq6ElVAuF+aupfUh0Y548eqVT8QfYSnw2ygAkLJPfdW7nYc67Rh5S2ZesPE5oK0WXGdOKbDJ33Ve LYJ5VXTi3O3SXEyAeFrQHDfZpqx1LVG7iuy26DtCDnAMtz8TbW3UfizmtrvKMEN3u0XeTQkv7u/yU WLe+S38g5bIjXMZTjn4Dbg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1625 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mufRi-0003gQ-P0; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:44:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8735n48e6a.fsf@metapensiero.it> (message from Lele Gaifax on Tue, 07 Dec 2021 19:26:05 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:221862 Archived-At: > From: Lele Gaifax > Cc: 52345@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 19:26:05 +0100 > > > If the second part just clarifies the existing text, should > > it perhaps be applied to the release branch? > > It makes sense, yes. Can you please teach me how should I proceed? I mean, > should I re-apply that hunk on top of the release branch (that is, emacs-28), > thus committing a different patch and resending as a new bug? If so, should I > mark the commit in some way, to reduce the inevitable conflict with master? It should be a separate commit against the emacs-28 branch, with "Don't merge to master" in the commit log message. Thanks.