unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 51993@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org
Subject: bug#51993: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Killing emacsclient terminal with `server-stop-automatically' doesn't prompt to save files
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:04:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83lepoi58p.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9920473-f655-6bc3-0d2b-efe53d74320c@gmail.com> (message from Jim Porter on Sun, 9 Oct 2022 15:09:15 -0700)

> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 15:09:15 -0700
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 51993@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> The patch adds two new hooks: 'server-before-delete-client-functions' 
> and 'server-after-delete-client-functions'. These should give people the 
> ability to add whatever behaviors they think make sense when closing an 
> emacsclient connection. The default behavior is the same as the current 
> default (call 'save-some-buffers' before deleting the client, and do 
> nothing after). To do something like the 'delete-frame' configuration of 
> the current 'server-stop-automatically' API, you might do something like 
> this:

Isn't this a bit of over-engineering for such a simple problem?  Why
couldn't we have a user option to decide what to do, and then just do
it?  The place where we delete client frames is well determined, so
doing something sensible there should be easy.

Hooks make sense when some Lisp program needs to turn on or off some
aspects of Emacs behavior, not when a user needs to control that
behavior.  For users, controlling behavior with hooks should be
reserved to relatively complex and/or obscure aspects of the behavior.

Thanks.





  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-10  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-20  4:29 bug#51993: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Killing emacsclient terminal with `server-stop-automatically' doesn't prompt to save files Jim Porter
2021-11-20  7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-11-23  9:48   ` Gregory Heytings
2021-11-23 18:25     ` Jim Porter
2021-11-23 20:37       ` Gregory Heytings
2021-11-23 22:08         ` Jim Porter
2021-11-23 22:49           ` Gregory Heytings
2021-11-23 23:42             ` Jim Porter
2021-11-23 23:59               ` Gregory Heytings
2021-11-24  1:10                 ` Jim Porter
2021-11-29  5:39 ` Jim Porter
2021-11-29 12:41   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-11-29 13:40     ` Gregory Heytings
2021-11-29 19:31       ` Jim Porter
2022-01-01  0:11         ` Jim Porter
2022-09-09 17:55       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-09 18:04         ` Jim Porter
2022-10-09 22:09           ` Jim Porter
2022-10-10  6:04             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2022-10-20  3:14               ` Jim Porter
2022-10-20  6:23                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-21  5:51                   ` Jim Porter
2022-10-21  6:38                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-22  3:46                       ` Jim Porter
2022-10-22  6:57                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-25  3:10                           ` Jim Porter
2022-10-30 22:32                             ` Jim Porter
2022-11-29  5:31                             ` Jim Porter
2022-12-01 17:29                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-02  1:09                                 ` bug#51993: 29.0.50; [PATCH for 29.1] " Jim Porter
2022-12-02 14:10                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-02 21:33                                     ` Jim Porter
2022-12-04 17:56                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-04 22:26                                         ` Jim Porter
2022-12-06 22:20                                           ` Jim Porter
2022-12-02  1:42                                 ` bug#51993: 29.0.50; [PATCH explanation] " Jim Porter
2022-12-02 14:31                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-11-29 19:12     ` bug#51993: 29.0.50; [PATCH] " Jim Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83lepoi58p.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=51993@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=gregory@heytings.org \
    --cc=jporterbugs@gmail.com \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).