bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@codeisgreat.org>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:23:19 +0530
> 
> * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el (eglot-server-programs): There are two
> ways to run rust-analyzer. After adding the rustup component,
> users can add rust-analyzer to path and run rust-analyzer directly
> or they may run ``rustup run stable rust-analyzer'' command. This
> revision adds the 2nd command to the list of server programs.
> ---
>  lisp/progmodes/eglot.el | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> index 63ebbe6cab..f54c2d2c3a 100644
> --- a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ eglot-alternatives
>                        when probe return (cons probe args)
>                        finally (funcall err)))))))
>  
> -(defvar eglot-server-programs `((rust-mode . ,(eglot-alternatives '("rust-analyzer" "rls")))
> +(defvar eglot-server-programs `((rust-mode . ,(eglot-alternatives '("rust-analyzer" ("rustup" "run" "stable" "rust-analyzer") "rls")))
>                                  (cmake-mode . ("cmake-language-server"))
>                                  (vimrc-mode . ("vim-language-server" "--stdio"))
>                                  (python-mode
> -- 
> 2.30.2

João, what is the procedure for handling the submissions such as this
one?  Should we ping you and wait for your decision, or are you okay
with installing such additions based on our own judgment?