From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20968: 25.0.50; Be able to specify the output directory for `byte-compile-file' Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 14:55:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83k2ugxhlw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <23829743-922e-4304-8ab3-b762b8193860@default> <74y4iytdjg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83pp49zb03.fsf@gnu.org> <83egkpyvvd.fsf@gnu.org> <83si94xrcn.fsf@gnu.org> <873814ky1b.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1436010981 2030 80.91.229.3 (4 Jul 2015 11:56:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 11:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20968@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alexis Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 04 13:56:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM3F-00068B-J9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:56:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM3E-0000oK-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM3C-0000oF-A9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM38-0000Dk-QE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM38-0000Db-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM38-0000ta-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20968 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20968.14360109093362 (code B ref 20968); Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2015 11:55:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM2F-0000s8-F1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:39643) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBM2C-0000rU-Lt for 20968@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NQY00A00OS77600@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 20968@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 14:54:29 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NQY003Z9P2TE970@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 14:54:29 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <873814ky1b.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104680 Archived-At: > From: Alexis > Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 20:38:40 +1000 > > Sadly, it seems increasing numbers of people are finding that, > compared to Web-based fora, email and mailing lists are too much > hassle / too complicated / too annoying / etc. Some feel that even > low-traffic lists (say, a few emails per day) are "too much > email", and filtering is either too complicated for them to set > up, or simply not available. Traffic is irrelevant: no one needs to subscribe in order to post. > i also guess that Web fora might tend to rank higher in search > engine results than mailing lists; if so, that might result in > more people signing up for the former than the latter.[1] That's not my experience. They are both indexed and appear in searches alike.