From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21612: 24.5; Configuration variable to delete auto-save file when intentionally killing buffer Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:00:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83k2r33k99.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvvz3mvk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443895282 27733 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2015 18:01:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 18:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21612@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marcus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 03 20:01:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR7O-0007x1-7A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 20:01:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39542 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR7N-0006UM-CW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:01:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR7K-0006UE-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR7G-0001ML-UZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR7G-0001MH-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR7G-0000Tb-FG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21612 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21612-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21612.14438952271775 (code B ref 21612); Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2015 18:00:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53899 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR6h-0000SY-9Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:46638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiR6e-0000SQ-S3 for 21612@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:00:25 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVN00700OCUVA00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 21612@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:00:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVN007Q7OOMGPB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:00:23 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:107275 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:53:05 +0200 > From: Marcus > Cc: 21612@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > This might even be useful default behavior. > > People sometimes answer YES by mistake. > > Isn't that why the "Modified buffers exist" question is yes/no rather than y/n? Yes, but with minibuffer history, it's easy to type " RET" thinking the previous reply was "no". > If I figure out how to have this controlled by an option, where (and how) would > I send a patch request? Please send it here, and please accompany it with a ChangeLog entry. > BTW, is my mailing list etiquette (formatting of replies etc.) acceptable? I see no problems with it. Thanks.