From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21953: Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:30:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83k2p8ysz8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <081tbn5g02.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d1v79mfz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448335882 29109 80.91.229.3 (24 Nov 2015 03:31:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21953@debbugs.gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 04:31:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Jw-00082H-9i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:31:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35872 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Jx-0000HQ-0c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Jt-0000H9-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Jq-0002Mj-A8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Jq-0002Mf-6v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Jp-0004nw-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21953.144833585018442 (code B ref 21953); Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2015 03:30:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Jb-0004nK-Os for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:30:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:39457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a14JE-0004mg-CK for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:30:43 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYA00400V21AY00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:30:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYA004PBV2M8H50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:30:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109167 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 21953@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:04:15 -0800 > > >>>>> Glenn Morris writes: > > > In any case, .elc files are pre-built in release tarfiles, so people > > building releases don't even see these warnings. So making it a release goal > > doesn't make sense to me. > > You know, that's a really good point. > > Perhaps this then: Development goal to reduce warnings as much as is feasible. > Long-term development goal to eliminate them. Release is not block either way. > > How does that sound, Eli, if Drew is right about users not seeing the > warnings? I thought this was how things were anyway.