From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22692: 25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:37:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83k2m0r1fr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <23698.1455674128@allegro.localdomain> <56C71C1D.8010502@yandex.ru> <83r3g8r8qz.fsf@gnu.org> <56C75A25.3090506@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455907172 24146 80.91.229.3 (19 Feb 2016 18:39:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22692@debbugs.gnu.org, m.kupfer@acm.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 19:39:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpxU-0004ED-V7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:39:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpxU-0003sP-G2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpxL-0003oX-2f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpxG-0005vv-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:39:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpxG-0005vk-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpxG-0007Qu-GA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22692 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22692.145590709328511 (code B ref 22692); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2016 18:38:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpwS-0007Pn-Ti for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:38:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpwR-0007Pa-I4 for 22692@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:38:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpwL-0005in-Eq for 22692@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpwF-0005hG-Bf; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:37:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4090 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpwE-0005Cs-Em; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:37:58 -0500 In-reply-to: <56C75A25.3090506@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:08:37 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113307 Archived-At: > Cc: 22692@debbugs.gnu.org, m.kupfer@acm.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:08:37 +0200 > > On 02/19/2016 05:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > It is a valid use case to try to find out whether a symbol already has > > some definition. In that case, saying "no definition" is what the > > user will expect for an undefined symbol, so asking for a symbol will > > confuse. > > Then we don't need to change anything there, do we? Yes, I think so. > >> We probably should just remove the word "valid" from there. > > > > That depends on how you will change the behavior ;-) > > Zero change is best change. :-) No, I meant the change you wanted to make in finding the symbol at point, to avoid looking for it anywhere on the same line.