From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33275: 27.0.50; Image cache pruning Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 20:35:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83k1lrcqza.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83va5bcxxu.fsf@gnu.org> <83sh0fcx2r.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9b3cu4f.fsf@gnu.org> <83muqncry4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541443175 449 195.159.176.226 (5 Nov 2018 18:39:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33275@debbugs.gnu.org To: larsi@gnus.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 05 19:39:30 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjmc-0008Rg-PG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 19:39:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjoj-0003aY-6w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:41:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjje-0005n7-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:36:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjjS-0005Ci-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:36:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjjG-00051y-IJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjjG-0007vi-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 18:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33275 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33275-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33275.154144295430468 (code B ref 33275); Mon, 05 Nov 2018 18:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33275) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2018 18:35:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35588 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjj7-0007vL-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:35:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57795) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjj5-0007v6-LC for 33275@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:35:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjiu-00046C-M7 for 33275@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:35:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjiq-0003yn-Pk; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3075 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gJjij-0006OB-8t; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:35:33 -0500 In-reply-to: <83muqncry4.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 05 Nov 2018 20:14:27 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152072 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 20:14:27 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 33275@debbugs.gnu.org > > I don't see why we should tweak our cache management for the benefit > of exceptional use case. Last time we did it (with fonts) we are > still leaking the wounds. ^^^^^^^ I meant "licking", of course ;-) > I think it should be enough to catch excess memory usage and signal an > error. I hope this is possible. I guess we lost the ability to do that automatically when we stopped using vm-limit.c on modern platforms? We still could use the memory limit calculated by get_lim_data in strategic places, like cache_image, to catch situations where the cache size exceeds some fraction of what ret_lim_data returns. Would that work?