From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34035: 26.1; Arabic shadda-kasrah renders incorrectly Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:15:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0xp96k8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y37sv38f.fsf@nexoid.at> <83zhs8gx50.fsf@gnu.org> <878seb12v1.fsf@tcd.ie> <83ft8iemek.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh6qsj6r.fsf@tcd.ie> <83tuwyd0h4.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27524"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, 34035@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, craven@gmx.net To: James Cloos Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 23 09:16:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kEb-00074e-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:16:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34550 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kEa-0001kU-Eg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kEU-0001kN-IE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kEU-000368-8P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kEU-0002Vu-4D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 34035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34035.15981669369624 (code B ref 34035); Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2020 07:15:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kE3-0002VA-TR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:15:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kE1-0002Uv-20 for 34035@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:15:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kDt-0002zE-Hi; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2012 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k9kDt-0003Rm-5E; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 03:15:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from James Cloos on Sun, 23 Aug 2020 02:41:09 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186027 Archived-At: > From: James Cloos > Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 34035@debbugs.gnu.org, > stefan@marxist.se, craven@gmx.net > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 02:41:09 -0400 > > i bet this is the same as the regression i posted a while back where > cr+hb fails to handle fully mono fonts whereas the xft-based code does > handle them. > > i suspect m17n-lib had the necessary code, whereas hb lazily only cares > aboutfonts with zero-width accents or with routines *in* each font > correctly to combine glyphs. I don't understand why you consider this a regression. For the shadda-kasrah case, the experts seem to unanimously say that both renderings are possible and correct, and which one is used is a stylistic preference.