From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43314: vc-bzr-test-bug9726 test fails on master Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:39:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0x0ha1u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mu1xijhq.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft7pifti.fsf@gnu.org> <838sdgj29j.fsf@gnu.org> <877dt03b4m.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8mchaj0.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6s1u5d.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36221"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43314@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 12:40:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgTU-0009HX-8n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:40:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60878 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgTT-0005Jj-91 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgTL-0005IX-0Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgTK-0001uk-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgTK-0005N9-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43314 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43314-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43314.159982076620604 (code B ref 43314); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43314) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 10:39:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42501 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgSk-0005MG-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:39:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58380) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgSi-0005M3-M7 for 43314@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgSd-0001rE-00; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:39:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2280 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgSc-0000KN-4h; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:39:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pn6s1u5d.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:31:58 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187810 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 43314@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:31:58 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Well, shouldn't Emacs also support brz? > > > > That's a separate issue. The problem here was caused by brz > > installing itself as bzr, but acting in (so it seems) an incompatible > > ways. > > I'm just saying And I said "maybe", which means it was a suggestion. So if people disagree, there's no need to argue, just do what you think is best. If we want to fix the test, then the first step would be to understand what does brz do differently in this scenario.