From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:39:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0w2a6an.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y2kjgqj5.fsf@dick> <83mu0z9o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2kjyxky.fsf@dick> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29617"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43834@debbugs.gnu.org To: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 07 08:40:25 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ37f-0007Ym-6c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:40:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ37d-00084O-NU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:40:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ37K-00084B-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ37K-0004hD-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ37K-0003Is-6G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 43834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43834.160205277212658 (code B ref 43834); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 06:39:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54882 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ36q-0003I6-5d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45614) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ36n-0003Ho-OF for 43834@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ36h-0004fg-Eo; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:39:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4739 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ36g-0006AB-Rr; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:39:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y2kjyxky.fsf@dick> (dick.r.chiang@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189982 Archived-At: > From: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com > Cc: 43834@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:16:13 -0400 > > Maintainer(s), > > The `emacs -Q` invocation demonstrates the process sentinel never fires upon > the completion of the sleep `start-process`. Note this failure only occurs > under X and when evaluating from the command line via `--eval` or `--funcall`. Thanks, I figured out that much. What I was asking for was a more detailed explanation why you propose to make the specific changes in your patches to fix that problem. IOW, how is the change in xsmfns.c supposed to remedy the problem you describe above? TIA