From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44020: 28.0.50; Prefer selection of colour emoji fonts? Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:55:55 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0vmp8n8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tuuvtl5n.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuuvwcd8.fsf@gnu.org> <87imba4454.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1315"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44020@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 17:03:02 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWgg-0000Eo-Fi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:03:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWgf-0006Jm-Bo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:03:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWas-0002wM-5O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWar-0000XJ-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWar-0001u5-Q0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44020 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44020.16031193637250 (code B ref 44020); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2020 14:56:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWZv-0001ss-I0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWZu-0001sO-3I for 44020@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWZo-0000Mt-MT; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:55:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2048 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWZi-00087W-IR; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:55:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:56:33 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190995 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: 44020@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:56:33 +0200 > > So revisiting this, it turns out I have *two* features sitting in my workspace: > > 1. splitting out the emoji into a separate script and setting the right > fontset > 2. adding composition rules for the zwj emoji described in > emoji-zwj-sequences.txt > > [2] has some complications regarding the default display of the > variation-selector, so Iʼll leave that aside for now, and continue on > updating [1] to Unicode 13.0 Thanks. Can you summarize the problems with [2]? I thought we had all of that figured out back when we discussed this.