From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:15:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0umtzv6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24917"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 15 16:17:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1keJmI-0006OS-3h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:17:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58926 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keJmH-0007iw-6F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keJm2-0007hO-Sx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keJm2-0007D7-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keJm2-0005QL-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160545337420791 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2020 15:16:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keJlF-0005PH-TY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34924) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keJlE-0005P5-Dd for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keJl9-0006tl-03; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1864 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1keJl8-0007Cl-C0; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193360 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800 > Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org > > a) Add a new argument to describe-map with the original buffer. Ensure > that the :filter function is run there. > > b) Change describe-map to return its output as a string. Unless I'm missing something, b) would be a backward-incompatible change, so I don't think we should consider it. If adding an argument is deemed not a good idea, how about binding a special variable to convey that information to describe-buffer-bindings?