From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44674: 28.0.50; Adding current-cpu-time for performance tests Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:27:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0ulrwbg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y2j1rz2f.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg99ryla.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8jx9o8v.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29414"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com, 44674@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 16 19:52:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kejcH-0007Ya-7n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:52:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44882 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kejcG-0000zc-6p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:52:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kejFO-00010Y-Mp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kejFO-0005Nz-DT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kejFO-0008DE-Af for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44674 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44674-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44674.160555128331502 (code B ref 44674); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44674) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2020 18:28:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kejEQ-0008C2-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:28:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kejEP-0008BY-DN for 44674@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kejEJ-00050c-G4; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:27:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2750 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kejEH-0001xN-7j; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:27:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87o8jx9o8v.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:59:28 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193456 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mattiase@acm.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com, > 44674@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:59:28 +0100 > > On Nov 16 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Sorry, forgot to answer the 'system' part. The issue there is whether > > calling 'system' (and in general waiting for sub-processes to exit) is > > counted against the process's use of CPU or not. AFAIK, this is not > > well defined, either. > > There's times and getrusage. Right. I was talking about 'clock', and I proposed to use 'times', instead for that very reason. It could also be a more useful feature to provide user and system time separately, btw.