From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45303: #45303 [feature/native-comp] building error on Windows Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 23:22:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0te6c7i.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28668"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pcfeb0009@gmx.com, 45303@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 18 22:24:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNF3-0007KL-KT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:24:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNF2-0004k7-L2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNEK-0004SJ-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:24:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNEJ-0004vf-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:24:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNEJ-00075I-2Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:24:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:24:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45303 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45303-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45303.160832658227105 (code B ref 45303); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:24:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45303) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2020 21:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNDK-000730-6s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39680) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNDI-00072S-U5 for 45303@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNDD-0004ZU-Ci; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:22:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2837 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kqNDC-0001MW-Rn; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:22:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196349 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:02:20 +0000 > Cc: 45303@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > > # patch to look for libgccjit-0.dll instead of libgcc.dll? lisp/term/w32-win.el & src/emacs.c > > sed -i -e 's/libgccjit.dll/libgccjit-0.dll/' lisp/term/w32-win.el > > sed -i -e 's/libgccjit.dll/libgccjit-0.dll/' src/emacs.c > > I've really no windows knowledge to judge that, perhaps Eli will > comment. If these are correct fixes you should submit a patch for > those. They are correct fixes, since DLLs on Windows usually have the API number in their names. In this case, I guess the API number is zero, so libgccjit-0.dll is correct (and libgccjit.dll probably doesn't exist in Windows installations of GCC/libgccjit).