From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45438: 27.1; please fix misleading documentation for assoc-delete-all Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 19:47:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0t3kup1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zh21fsb3.fsf@cert.kernkonzept.com> <87blehcyai.fsf@gnus.org> <834kk8n8a8.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, hendrik.tews@kernkonzept.com, 45438@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 27 18:48:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kta9M-0000Cy-42 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 18:48:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33302 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kta9L-0000GN-6x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:48:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kta9C-0000Ek-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kta9C-00013A-Em for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kta9C-0007RC-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45438 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 45438-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45438.160909126428566 (code B ref 45438); Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45438) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2020 17:47:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kta8u-0007Qg-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59102) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kta8s-0007QS-Tg for 45438@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:47:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kta8m-0000xE-TT; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3946 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kta8U-00053n-4t; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:47:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:38:30 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196810 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, hendrik.tews@kernkonzept.com, > 45438@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:38:30 -0500 > > > If the suggestion is to use ChangeLog data for this feature, then I > > think it won't be easy, because it isn't easy to parse the ChangeLog > > text for gleaning this more accurate information. > > I'm not suggesting we do anything about this problem. Do you see > any reason to? We were asked to consider doing that by 2 different people. I agree that the problem is not an urgent one nor a grave one, but if someone wants to work on making that part of documentation more accurate, I think gleaning the info from ChangeLog is not the best approach.