From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46243: [External] : Re: bug#46243: 26.3; If invoke menu item that reads a char, get keystrokes echo Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:15:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0rp3wew.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r1lz60so.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6sm5rlr.fsf@gnu.org> <83pn1h401u.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20051"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 18:21:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lq8-000538-OF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:21:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37012 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lq7-0004zM-PI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Ll4-0008Ao-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Ll4-00031M-8P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Ll4-00077i-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 17:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46243.161237252627328 (code B ref 46243); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 17:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2021 17:15:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7LkU-00076i-AP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:15:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7LkS-00076T-5h for 46243@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:15:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7LkM-0002qp-Tx; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:15:18 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1620 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7LkL-0006te-UQ; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:15:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 03 Feb 2021 11:16:58 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199214 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, 46243@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 11:16:58 -0500 > > > The change you installed is not explained, so I cannot reason about > > the importance of echo_message_buffer. Do you remember why you > > decided to remove that 3rd condition? > > I don't think I understood the echo-keystrokes code very back then and > I still don't understand it very much either. > > This fixed the problem, but I'm not sure why. Do you happen to remember how you came to think that echo_message_buffer was involved in that old bug report's scenario?