From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:07:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0qagtfe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg52lykn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8lrmf.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw4lelg.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8jgn2.fsf@gnu.org> <834khfjv7q.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupfia1m.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv7hy5c.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qbhvnh.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw3hu5f.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17114"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 47067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 14 07:08:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJv8-0004NK-2q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:08:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJv6-0007dP-SS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJv0-0007dF-Sn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJv0-0004xI-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJv0-0006KN-Fq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47067.161570202624064 (code B ref 47067); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 06:07:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJu6-0006Fy-HJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJu5-0006CV-1v for 47067@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:07:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJtz-0004IV-3n; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:06:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1934 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJts-00088i-NA; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 01:06:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:07:55 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202333 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:07:55 +0000 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 47067@debbugs.gnu.org > > Pip Cet writes: > > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 8:53 PM Andrea Corallo wrote: > >> One confirmation that the issue is the one suggested by Pip would be > >> running the test we added for this with like: > > > > Andrea, are you aware of any reason not to call setjmp directly on Windows? > > No I'm not, as I don't see a reason to do it probably we should just go > for the direct call as we do for other systems. If someone can send a patch, I could try it. TIA.