From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49043: 27.1: ibuffer-toggle-filter-group [BUGFIX] Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:10:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0mt20t0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210615155231.75wevy3wtzu4vx7l@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87k0mvrto4.fsf@gnus.org> <20210615201851.jwnjx23qptp3agp7@E15-2016.optimum.net> <878s3aql10.fsf@gnus.org> <20210616082601.zznhdrng76yseug3@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83czsm2exu.fsf@gnu.org> <20210616170108.o3kp766phcydwdih@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10460"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 49043@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 16 19:11:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ4T-0002V6-7P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:11:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ4S-000352-91 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:11:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ4C-0002zn-FI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ49-0000ho-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ49-00032A-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49043 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49043-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49043.162386340711586 (code B ref 49043); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49043) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2021 17:10:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53301 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ3H-00030o-Gm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ3F-0002zk-De for 49043@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ3A-00006f-5a; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:10:00 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3083 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltZ39-0000gA-Pd; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:10:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210616170108.o3kp766phcydwdih@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:01:08 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208642 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:01:08 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 49043@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Another approach to consider would be to put bounds-checking in function > > > delete-region against (point-min) and (point-max). > > > > delete-region already does include such checking, that's why you get > > the backtrace: it signals an error. > > You've missed the point. Sorry about that. Could you please point out what I missed?