From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49878: Emacs Tarball Should Include Uninstall Script Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:11:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0kyj09l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sfzognbt.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0l0jfps.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuk2c3rj.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26715"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org, Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 06 13:12:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlr-0006kR-11 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 13:12:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38436 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlp-00006F-TO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:12:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlj-0008Uf-3a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxli-0003Wb-S6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxli-0008Vz-8s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49878.162824830832691 (code B ref 49878); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2021 11:11:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlU-0008VD-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlN-0008Uf-8i for 49878@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlH-0003E9-UG; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4780 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlH-0001wQ-HE; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tuk2c3rj.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:37:52 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211322 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com, 49878@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:37:52 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > We have "make uninstall" -- why isn't that what's being requested > > here? > > Oh, didn't know about that. Hm... Yeah, I guess it should do the > trick. But it's not included in the tarball, I think? What do you mean by "not included"? It's in the top-level Makefile.in that _is_ part of a release tarball.