From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29805: [External] : bug#29805: 27.0; doc of `tooltip-resize-echo-area' Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 08:52:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0i33r6k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5A3D4775.2010700@gmx.at> <7614565b-94d6-40fe-a3d1-cf51235a21bc@default> <5A3E14EC.3010809@gmx.at> <5A3EA97E.9060501@gmx.at> <83y26j4ns2.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmrv4kam.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20498"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 29805-done@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 24 07:53:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1meWRR-00057x-Hq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:53:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41226 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meWRQ-0001DK-8V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meWRK-0001D3-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meWRK-0003J3-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meWRK-0000TN-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:53:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 29805 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Mail-Followup-To: 29805@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 29805-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D29805.16350547761800 (code D ref 29805); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29805-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 05:52:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meWRD-0000Sy-Rc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:52:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55028) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meWRA-0000Sl-Mx for 29805-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:52:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meWR3-00038w-Lr; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:52:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2067 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meWR2-00072g-Vd; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:52:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 23 Oct 2021 19:50:27 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218058 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > CC: "stefan@marxist.se" , > "29805@debbugs.gnu.org" > <29805@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 19:50:27 +0000 > > Where do you think the echo area is manifested, if > you have a minibuffer-only frame and no other frame > has a minibuffer? Nowhere. > > It makes no sense to talk about resizing the minibuffer-only frame, > > because it has more than one line to begin with. > > Nonsense. Thank you, this is my final clue that this discussion goes nowhere, as it happens so frequently with you. Bug closed.