From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57400: 29.0.50; Support sending patches from VC directly Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:28:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83k06v1957.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84v8qgn1z9.fsf@iki.fi> <87h71zo3p8.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfljmgwz.fsf@posteo.net> <83sflj1dbo.fsf@gnu.org> <87fshjmeje.fsf@posteo.net> <83mtbr1b6l.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17472"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, 57400@debbugs.gnu.org To: Antoine Kalmbach Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 26 14:33:53 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYX2-0004LZ-AU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:33:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33250 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYX1-00088N-6d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYSM-00038h-Rj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYSM-0001xb-Gp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYSM-0003TR-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57400.166151691113317 (code B ref 57400); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2022 12:28:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYRr-0003Si-Gv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:28:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYRq-0003SU-Jz for 57400@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYRk-0001qk-Jh; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:28:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=+4C2I85h2nxFR/yQ0V8X8mczO6C4+/KDeTDxJNhevUU=; b=MxiYE3zmgNXz CN4zbcXHqEE3UA24ZUzkzr0b14zS4E9N4cjTwmgZPKOvfsIR7UHqKAGR28kC3YGZvH8hmnCBz7Mjz PcKj3SoLX5TvMgxGaqXust1bl6lFuwvw/Qcl15JRPBr8T5+h/Im2W+QxGKZLVymgzXyda0eONag/Y cOwbIRFE8r/Jep7L3C3D1KB2E8DGA8babOlXKRP5otNDJaliPYZGEgl2iFyFxgfZHkAOWXHSTkkqj VS88iH9ozshG0fvA7Xg6hKZwK1m/VG+AtXdd+rPM50TeEIT6iwlTNYG0tlAkJ7XlJo5j0Mo4iCliS fmgQOrmhLC6YU+XzJs5WSA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4551 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRYRj-0002cM-4g; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:28:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Antoine Kalmbach on Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:08:01 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240829 Archived-At: > From: Antoine Kalmbach > Cc: 57400@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:08:01 +0300 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > Also, I'm not sure why we'd need to send each patch file separately. > >> > Why not add them one by one as attachments to the same email message? > >> > >> This wouldn't work if we are sending patches to a mailing list that > >> assumes patches are sent out by git send-email, and that the messages > >> can be filtered through git am. > > > > "git am" handles attachments without any problems, I do it all the > > time. > > But you have to save the attached .patch files and then run git am on > those. No, I just use M-| from Emacs. > > But I don't object to having optional behaviors here. My point is > > that we should allow sending all the patches together, as that is the > > preferred/usual practice in Emacs development. > > Yes, but users would have to apply the customization to get the Emacs > way of working, I think. You are now arguing about the default value of that option? Let's delay that until the feature is done and the option is available, okay?