From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68006: 30.0.50; Image-mode speed Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83jzopvsgj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87le9jlfd6.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83wmt29zfy.fsf@gnu.org> <87il4m6rcx.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83bkae9j11.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkadyqdk.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <8334voanr1.fsf@gnu.org> <877cl0zvln.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83y1dg954u.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfxvalnq.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83o7eb938y.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmsxmff3.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83mstt5hrk.fsf@gnu.org> <87frzjvpb5.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83le9a3kqs.fsf@gnu.org> <83zfxnzyrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87mstnafie.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83r0izzn1p.fsf@gnu.org> <87le95rqoh.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83plyhvvso.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6jtrlci.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26753"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 68006@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 19:57:15 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLSu3-0006iK-Jm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:57:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLStv-0003vd-Ko; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLStn-0003uq-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:56:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLStn-0000lc-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:56:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLStq-0004He-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 18:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68006 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68006-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68006.170439456816405 (code B ref 68006); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 18:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2024 18:56:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLSsx-0004GX-Ox for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLSst-0004Fz-IT for 68006@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLSsk-0000eD-7M; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:55:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=T/qdtXM5vyBdjl0hJRjq9dhL2JKRlePQjFNwoa+vGio=; b=hpwChtncAF8h SQ2sUAZMNUnNIKcWsTbcIqzCB8wnBdwMPufQleb/V9q6eswfM+2PjVFN24zm8MQqnbi53+jb8WXfm 9wdtCyfIaXM/FKfhPvxJ9xzs7TPX+06jJ4nw/BpO7izgzkuVBgwZrOBKoiG0JCzISqQ5Lq03cj3Do cbOolUEF0Wk86/bWAYDSoT44yM0OBBCjaQNgC1QeTMZyMqdTj2S5Hp0D5L2M2GbTt12V1KDoASv+u NirmA+io6IBKPmllnKu6rTYIo/u9EMHccRFlbOiT1y38KsKhpMa0aVmrgoV1ToXU9qWhUj9AbF/0V f2Mi6Zlz/WePWQ770BRbxg==; In-Reply-To: <87h6jtrlci.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (message from Manuel Giraud on Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:42:53 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277328 Archived-At: > From: Manuel Giraud > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 68006@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:42:53 +0100 > > But anyway, you're thinking about another image cache completely user > manageable? Yes. > I guess it is a much more harder problem to tackle. Probably. But anything else will be IMO a kludge. (We do have kludges in Emacs, so we could have one here as well, of course. I just thought that it would be good to avoid it if possible). > For starters, as the current image-mode is using the 'image' display > property which uses the current image cache, I imagine that it > should then be replaced by something else? Yes, probably. And if you are going for the simple solution, please keep in mind that image-cache-eviction-delay is a global variable, and the images are cached on a per-frame basis. So if image-mode enlarges image-cache-eviction-delay, it will affect all the images, not just those in image-mode buffers. One more reason why I think we should provide a separate and differently managed cache for this purpose.