From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13612: 24.3.50; Incorrect syntax highlighting in cc-mode Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:15:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83ip67aihv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874nhuguh6.fsf@shorty.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834nhuawh2.fsf@gnu.org> <20130204125944.77cf078a@fatty> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360012564 13612 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2013 21:16:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13612@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dima Kogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 04 22:16:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOo-0003eS-4i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:16:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33028 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOV-0004CA-JZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOQ-00042S-P3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:15:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOP-0002OJ-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:15:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TON-0002NV-HL; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:15:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TPR-0000cp-Q3; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13612 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13612-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13612.13600125712338 (code B ref 13612); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2013 21:16:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOc-0000be-Lt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:45199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOa-0000bV-9w for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHP00800S7LAK00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:14:59 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHP00866SCZ5H40@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:14:59 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20130204125944.77cf078a@fatty> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70701 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:59:44 -0800 > From: Dima Kogan > > Should I close this bug? No, I suggest to wait for a word from the maintainer of CC Mode.