From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16251: 24.3.50; `icomplete-mode' breaks my file opening now Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 20:02:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83iouc6c7a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <497ebd3d-d69b-4ac4-9d8c-ca2f4a1a2ac1@default> <52BA978F.4010804@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387994594 15512 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2013 18:03:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 18:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16251@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 25 19:03:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvsnf-0001Yv-O3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 19:03:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43118 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvsnf-0008Pd-6R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:03:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvsnV-0008PK-B9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:03:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvsnP-000443-0T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvsnO-00043x-TO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvsnO-0006kh-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 18:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16251 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16251-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16251.138799456725925 (code B ref 16251); Wed, 25 Dec 2013 18:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16251) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2013 18:02:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvsn9-0006k5-Cr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:02:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:41130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvsn6-0006jl-EM for 16251@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:02:45 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MYD00H00JFRB800@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16251@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 20:02:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MYD00HYCJG9A010@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 20:02:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <52BA978F.4010804@dancol.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82594 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:30:07 -0800 > From: Daniel Colascione > > Why is finding the list of files so slow for you? Don't you experience > the same performance problem after typing a character and forcing > completions to show up? We call the completion function inside > while-no-input, so we should abort the "several seconds" of work as soon > as you start typing. Maybe because input on Windows is not signal-driven, and therefore while-no-input relies on the Lisp code paying frequent attention to QUIT. I tried just now enabling icomplete-mode in "emacs -Q", and can confirm that "C-x C-f" becomes painfully slow to react to typing in a large directory, especially with a cold cache.