From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17309: 24.4.50; Typos in autotype info Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:53:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83ioq1b91t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r44q7jvc.fsf@gmail.com> <83r44qaxi1.fsf@gnu.org> <53563868.3020900@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398185666 14644 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2014 16:54:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.synacek@gmail.com, 17309@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 18:54:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdxX-00009W-4X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:54:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdxW-0007hf-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdxP-0007hP-04 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdxK-0005NC-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdxK-0005N8-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdxJ-0000go-L7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17309 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17309-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17309.13981855932565 (code B ref 17309); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17309) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2014 16:53:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdwW-0000fI-Lx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:61670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WcdwU-0000f2-I0 for 17309@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N4F00M00YEB5V00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 17309@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:53:09 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N4F00LRAYWKYS80@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:53:09 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88213 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 17309@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:40:43 -0400 > > Indeed, I think "iff" is perfectly fine in docstrings, but we should > refrain from using it in the Texinfo documentation. Besides Glossary, autotype.info and message.info are the only manuals that do, for the grand total of 3 (three) occurrences. So I'd say we follow our own advice quite well.