From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17713: First portion of `bt full` Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 11:00:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83iooe4gdm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwdq4gvk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402041687 6105 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2014 08:01:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17713@debbugs.gnu.org To: Geoff Shannon Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 06 10:01:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp5T-0006mk-Q8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:01:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp5T-0000wL-6l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp5K-0000oD-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp5C-0005KR-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp5C-0005KN-8x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp5B-0006Hf-RB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17713 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17713-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17713.140204164324109 (code B ref 17713); Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2014 08:00:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp4s-0006Gn-QT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:33062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsp4m-0006GL-TX for 17713@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6Q00200LKY7600@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 17713@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:57:04 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6Q0075MM34JB10@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:57:04 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90114 Archived-At: > From: Geoff Shannon > Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:57:10 -0700 > Cc: 17713@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Are you sure it is hung, and not in some very long GC? I see nothing > > wrong in the backtrace you sent, it just shows that Emacs is > > collecting garbage. Lots of it. It is not unusual for GC to have > > tens of thousands of recursive calls to mark_object, because GC is > > highly recursive. > > > > Not sure at all, but before I decided it was hung I let it sit for several > seconds at least. Several seconds is too little. > > If you leave it running, does it eventually recover and become > > responsive again? Or does it keep being stuck forever? > > > > So I let it run in the debugger again. It is still unresponsive, though it > is still blinking the > cursor. It seems to be totally unresponsive to keystrokes and mouseclicks > (it's a GTK windowed emacs). Let's see if it comes back to life any time soon. Did you customize any GC-related options, like gc-cons-threshold?