From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14333: 24.3.50; Emacs hangs when trying to exit Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:37:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83iomq4w29.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tx6pb6ay.fsf@gnu.org> <83ha2paz0h.fsf@gnu.org> <838uo1auca.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbr080d3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405953517 5844 80.91.229.3 (21 Jul 2014 14:38:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14333@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 21 16:38:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X9EjV-0002zx-KH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:38:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34529 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9EjU-0005cH-PD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9EjK-0005bp-KX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:38:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9Ej6-0007gQ-Vi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9Ej6-0007gM-Rw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X9Ej6-0002AY-9q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:38:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:38:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14333 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 14333-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14333.14059534788324 (code B ref 14333); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:38:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14333) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2014 14:37:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33489 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X9Eiv-0002A7-N0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:56877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X9Eio-00029h-DE for 14333@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N9200700GGZ9200@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 14333@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:37:40 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N92007O9GMSFS00@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:37:40 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91724 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:35:01 +0200 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: "14333@debbugs.gnu.org" <14333@debbugs.gnu.org> > > > However, I suspect that GDB lies to us about the backtrace, and at the > > very least conceals part of the stack frames. Could you please > > produce the stack traces from Process Explorer, as you did in the > > past? > > See below. These stack traces come from the pre-release version > 24.3.92, with just the change you told me: > > > If you comment out the call to term_winsock in term_ntproc, does the > > problem go away? Thanks. Which optional DLLs do you usually have loaded into Emacs at this stage, and are any of them dependent on libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll? (Let me know if you need help in determining which DLLs are dynamically loaded by Emacs by using Process Explorer.)