From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: 19466@debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com
Subject: bug#19466: 25.0.50; xref-find-def doesn't find C functions
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 18:01:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ioflipt0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CD8E72.5000902@yandex.ru>
> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 04:24:50 +0200
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> CC: 19466@debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com
>
> On 01/31/2015 10:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > I tried that a few days ago, but didn't see any significant changes in
> > behavior. I'm probably missing something -- what exactly did you want
> > me to pay attention to?
>
> What have you tried, exactly?
I evaluated your suggested code, and then typed "M-.".
> You should have noticed that `M-.' in emacs-lisp-mode buffers behaves
> like in other buffers and uses the current tags table (and prompts for
> it if the tags table hasn't been visited yet).
It does.
> I've found one caveat now: even though the tags list is not buffer-local
> (right?), (tags-lazy-completion-table) returns different results in
> lisp/**/*.el buffers and src/*.c buffers.
Yes, it's not 100% smooth.
> `find-tag' completion exhibits the same difference. For instance,
> calling `M-x find-tag' in src/disp.c, then typing `display_li' and
> pressing TAB will complete it to `display_line'. No so in
> lisp/progmodes/etags.el. Doing it in that buffer results in [No match].
That's not what I see, both in Emacs 24.4 and with the current trunk:
the completion works even in buffers whose major mode is emacs-lisp.
> However, typing `display_line' fully in either, then pressing RET,
> brings you to that function's definition. This should be considered a
> bug, right?
Yes, except that I don't see it, at least not in "emacs -Q".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-01 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-29 19:27 bug#19466: 25.0.50; xref-find-def doesn't find C functions Eli Zaretskii
2014-12-30 4:57 ` Dmitry Gutov
2014-12-30 15:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-12-30 18:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-12-30 18:25 ` Dmitry Gutov
2014-12-30 18:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-12-30 18:38 ` Dmitry Gutov
2014-12-30 22:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-02 17:52 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-04 20:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-04 20:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-04 23:14 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-05 3:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-05 6:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-16 3:37 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-16 7:47 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-16 9:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-16 9:28 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-19 3:31 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-19 8:28 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-19 13:32 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-20 8:01 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-20 12:14 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-20 14:51 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-21 7:20 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-21 10:49 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-21 14:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-21 16:54 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-21 18:00 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-21 20:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-22 2:32 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-22 18:22 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-21 19:02 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-22 2:26 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-22 18:22 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-19 17:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-20 2:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-20 17:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-20 20:49 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-21 16:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-22 2:43 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-22 18:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-22 21:02 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-23 9:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-23 17:34 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-23 21:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-23 22:23 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-24 9:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-24 16:47 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-31 8:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-01 2:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-02-01 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-02-01 20:11 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-02-01 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-01 20:53 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-02-02 3:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-23 2:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-23 21:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-23 21:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-16 9:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-04 22:14 ` Dmitry Gutov
2014-12-30 20:43 ` Dmitry Gutov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83ioflipt0.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=19466@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=eller.helmut@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).