From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20843: 24.5; Profiler error: "Invalid sampling interval" Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:50:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83ioafh915.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k2v1l7g4.fsf@gnu.org> <5585B8C4.1050204@cornell.edu> <83r3p6i4b1.fsf@gnu.org> <5585DF69.7090008@cornell.edu> <83oak9hzzs.fsf@gnu.org> <558737F7.4080709@cornell.edu> <83r3p3hi22.fsf@gnu.org> <55884E42.607@cornell.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434999145 31560 80.91.229.3 (22 Jun 2015 18:52:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sva-news@mygooglest.com, 20843@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 22 20:52:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76pG-0000JU-Dv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:52:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76pF-00041Q-Qy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76pC-00041H-BW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76p9-0005ER-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76p8-0005EA-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76p8-00043G-B9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20843 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20843-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20843.143499907015513 (code B ref 20843); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2015 18:51:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76oH-000428-BQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:51517) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z76oF-00041d-0c for 20843@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NQD00M000CYE300@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 20843@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:53:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NQD00HB00HA2Y50@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:53:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <55884E42.607@cornell.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104234 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:04:50 -0400 > From: Ken Brown > CC: sva-news@mygooglest.com, 20843@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Looks fine, but perhaps it would be cleaner to return the actual > > message string or some distinctive code from setup_cpu_timer. This > > would avoid the need for a global variable. > > Is this better? Yes, thanks.