From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21816: elisp-mode-tests fails on a case-preserving filesystem Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 23:02:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83io5ivlso.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86mvuv30i1.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86y4ef16ha.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83d1vrw0p9.fsf@gnu.org> <5638D836.8090600@yandex.ru> <5638DE4A.308@yandex.ru> <83ziyvujmj.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhaevp4q.fsf@fastmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446584602 31691 80.91.229.3 (3 Nov 2015 21:03:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 21:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21816@debbugs.gnu.org To: Random832 Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 03 22:03:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtijW-0003ha-68 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 22:03:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtijV-0007Bx-Gq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtijR-0007BZ-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtijO-00014P-Gq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32926) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtijO-00014L-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtijO-00056N-7E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21816 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21816-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21816.144658454019562 (code B ref 21816); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21816) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2015 21:02:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51867 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztiii-00055R-2s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:02:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:56981) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztiif-00055I-K6 for 21816@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:02:18 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NX900600BDT5Q00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 21816@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 22:55:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NX900IAEBGOMZB0@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 22:55:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87lhaevp4q.fsf@fastmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108389 Archived-At: > From: Random832 > Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:50:29 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Both forms (and some additional ones) are perfectly canonical. > > That is a contradiction in terms. There can only be one canonical > form. Not if "canonical" does not tell anything about letter-case or the flavor of slashes.