From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25071: 26.0.50; Various Forth related improvements for etags Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:21:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83inr5q9i4.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480519342 3496 195.159.176.226 (30 Nov 2016 15:22:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25071@debbugs.gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 16:22:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6i0-0007OC-Mn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:22:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6i4-0007tg-Es for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:22:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6hx-0007se-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:22:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6ht-0004KB-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6ht-0004K5-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:22:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6ht-0000lC-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:22:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25071 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25071-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25071.14805192722862 (code B ref 25071); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2016 15:21:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47655 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6h6-0000k6-5X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:21:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6h5-0000jv-Ib for 25071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:21:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6gw-0003kT-JW for 25071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6gw-0003kM-Fc; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2131 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cC6gv-0008Vq-P1; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:21:02 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Helmut Eller on Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:29:40 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126311 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:29:40 +0100 > > I'd like to propose a patch to etags for better Forth support. Thanks! > With the patch, etags creates explicit tag names. That works better in > combination with tag-exact-match-p. Can you explain more about this? Explicit tag names bloat the TAGS files, so other languages don't use that by default, except where really needed. Could it be that only some tags need to be written as explicit, e.g. because they contain some special characters? Also, it sounds like you send a patch wrt emacs-25 branch; if so, please rebase on master, since that is where the patch will be pushed eventually. The test files are in a different place on master. Thanks again for working on this.