From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:12:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83indeu0xn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zikiwpl6.fsf@igalia.com> <878trzo5ys.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fum7o0qu.fsf@gnu.org> <87zikfmiiy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878tq0dqgw.fsf@gnus.org> <87sho1gemz.fsf@gnu.org> <87vasigi2c.fsf@igalia.com> <871sv2krfc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8360d1yzvj.fsf@gnu.org> <877exbhbc5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k21bj7sb.fsf@detlef> <87y3phgf3a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k210mr8l.fsf@gnu.org> <83374t117z.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7yra2bz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83o9n7t669.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1xu90eg.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512915258 2728 195.159.176.226 (10 Dec 2017 14:14:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 25061@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 10 15:14:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Mp-0000HA-56 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:14:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Mw-0008Ny-6g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:14:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Ml-0008Nk-VS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:14:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Ml-0004Cp-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:14:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Mk-0004C6-UF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Mk-00058q-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25061 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25061-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25061.151291519819702 (code B ref 25061); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25061) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2017 14:13:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Lx-00057a-Mi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:13:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Ls-00057I-8r for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:13:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2Ll-0003In-Pn for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2LL-00031E-NI; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1940 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eO2LL-0007fr-3q; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:12:35 -0500 In-reply-to: <87k1xu90eg.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:29:27 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140896 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 25061@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org > Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:29:27 -0500 > > It would change behavior for everyone for the sake of fixing a few > setups. Does %DUMBFW or %COMPAT create a risk that's not justified by > the functionality it provides? These exceptions have a way of living > long past their expiration date. > > If we're confident that's the right thing, then let's change it in the > release and add a note in the docs. I'm OK with the change; any other > comments? What should be the actual string? You mean, should we use %COMPAT or %DUMBFW? I think the latter. But if no one can reproduce the problem and verify the fix, I think we should simply describe the problem in PROBLEMS and leave the code intact. > Regardless, I'll make the connection profile changes in master, which > gives us more time to find problems and provide a better integration for > them. Sounds good, thanks.